"Defending the inventor, armed with the patent shield,

under the banner of inventions promoting progress..."

versione italiana deutsch version


Over 70 patent and trademark attorneys, technically and legally qualified, work at Modiano & Partners alongside our trial lawyers. This close cooperation enables our litigation team to handle any litigation in the IP field.

Patent litigation
The close contact between trial lawyers and patent attorneys within the same environment enables us to handle patent litigation with maximum efficiency and speed. As part of this interaction, our patent attorneys and our trial lawyers meet with the client beforehand, to discuss the technical and legal strategy of the litigation. All aspects are discussed, including economic. There is an undoubted advantage in the international outlook of our team, which enables us to provide assistance in patent litigation for European or international patent disputes.

Trademark litigation
In litigation on trademarks, the exceptional level of specialization that we have acquired throughout the world enables our trademark attorneys to work from a position of significant advantage.
We also constantly offer expert assistance on behalf of our clients to foreign lawyers dealing with IP infringement or litigation in the US, France, the UK and elsewhere, and what enables us to do this is the international experience we have acquired.
The international outlook of our trademark attorneys and their language skills ensure that we provide our foreign associates with clear and high quality information on any developments.


March 17, 2021
Pharmaceuticals and dosage regimen claims at the European Patent Office.

In the field of pharmaceuticals, it often happens that once an active ingredient is discovered and a first suitable formulation […]


2020年, 欧洲专利局 (EPO) 的上诉委员会 (BoA) 引入了新的议事规则. 上诉委员会强调, 上述规则的作用是对审查或异议中的一审程序进行司法审查. 新规则对在上诉中引入新证据、事实和论点的可能性进行了重大限制. 尽管如此, 上诉委员会于2020年12月7日发布的一项裁决认为, 上诉委员会具有否决一审程序中事实认定的权力. 上诉委员会在该决定中提到了其较早的一项决定. 根据该决定, 只有当欧洲专利局一审法庭对证据的评估存在以下缺陷之一时, 上诉委员会才应推翻该法庭在一审程序中作出的事实认定: (1) 没有考虑基本要点; (2) 审议不相关的事项; […]

February 23, 2021

欧洲专利局 (EPO) 正在密切关注人工智能 (Al) . 2020年12月, 欧洲专利局组织了一场为期2天的会议, 讨论了人工智能对知识产权的影响, 以及人工智能给欧洲专利局带来的益处. 这次会议反映出欧洲专利局正在对与人工智能有关的发明的可专利性问题进行重新定义. 欧洲专利局的立场是, 人工智能是计算机科学的一个分支. 因此, 根据欧洲专利局的做法, 与人工智能有关的发明被认为是“计算机实现的发明” (computer-implemented inventions, 简称CII) , 即涉及计算机、计算机网络或其他可编程装置的发明, […]

Different fact-finding at the EPO Boards of Appeal: is it possible?

As recently as last year the Boards of Appeal (BoAs) of the European Patent Office (EPO) introduced new rules of […]

January 20, 2021
EPO:可为植物授予欧洲专利 但有例外情况

在2020年10月公布的一项决定中, 欧洲专利局 (EPO) 扩大上诉委员会 (EBoA, 即欧洲专利局的最高审判机构) 认为, 可以为植物授予欧洲专利, 但其中有一个明显的例外情形. 《欧洲专利公约》 (The European Patent Convention, EPC) 规定, 可以为植物授予欧洲专利, 只要其权利要求不限于特定的植物品种. 而事实上, 根据《国际植物新品种保护公约》 […]

Artificial intelligence and the European Patent Office.

The European Patent Office is paying close attention to artificial intelligence (AI). In December 2020 it organized a 2-day conference […]

December 2, 2020
To plant or not to plant? The European Patent Office answers.

In a decision published in October 2020, the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBoA) of the European Patent Office (EPO), i.e. […]

November 18, 2020
The Doctrine of Equivalents: Examination of the Law in Italy.

Background Italy has a population of about 60 million and, as one of the most industrialized countries in the European […]


2020年9月, 欧洲专利局 (EPO) 的一个上诉委员会 (BoA) 在其作出的一份决定中认为, 欧洲专利局异议部门 (OD) 的某些行为侵犯了当事人的申诉权利, 并决定对该侵权行为进行补救.相关事实如下: 在异议程序中, 专利所有人在听证会结束之前, 已经在异议部门设定的截止日期前提出了一些辅助索赔请求.专利所有人起草这些辅助索赔请求, 是为了回应异议部门所传达给当事人的初步意见, 这些意见随参加听证会的传票一同送达当事各方. 在听证会期间, 异议部门改变了其在召集各听证当事方时的立场.但是, 当专利所有人试图在听证会期间提出四项新的索赔要求, 以回应异议部门的立场改变时, 异议部门利用其自由裁量权拒绝接受一项以上的索赔要求.也就是说, […]

October 21, 2020
The European Patent Office listens to users when it comes to the right to be heard.

In a decision of September 2020, a Board of Appeal (BoA) of the European Patent Office (EPO) found that the […]

To use reCAPTCHA you must get an API key from https://www.google.com/recaptcha/admin/create